cher journal,
je vous vroudrais poussez un coup de geule contre sourceforge et sa gestion des cvs : non seulement il y a pas de probleme pour y acceder, mais desormais on accede au contenu qui a ete sauver il y a au moins 24 h, en gros a moins d'etre developpeur on a plus les modifications qui viennent d'etre faite (sympa pour tester les patch et co...)....
From the sf.net site: -
( 2003-06-13 08:17:23 - Project CVS Services ) The SourceForge.net
team is aware of the continued performance issues afflicting project CVS
services. While a portion of the work needed to alleviate these issues
has been completed, we are currently waiting for the implementation of
new hardware to complete this work; this is expected to occur in the
month of August. In the mean time, the following steps will be taken by
SourceForge.net staff: developer (SSH) CVS access will not be changed;
pserver-based CVS access from the project shell servers (i.e. from cron
jobs) will not be changed, but the overall cap of pserver connections
from the shell will be lowered to a more reasonable level; pserver-based
CVS access from external hosts (i.e. not the project shell server) will
be served against the backup CVS server, which contains data roughly 24
hours older than that on the primary CVS server; ViewCVS access will be
provided using the backup CVS server (data shown by ViewCVS may be older
than the current data in the repository). These changes will be
transparent to users and will not require any configuration changes on
your part. These measures are temporary and will be removed pending the
successful completion of our work to improve performance on the primary
CVS server. It is our expectation that offloading ViewCVS services and
pserver-based CVS access to the backup CVS server will bring developer
CVS performance back to a reasonable level. Should you have questions or
concerns regarding this matter, please contact the SourceForge.net team
by submitting a Support Request.
Journal sourceforge et cvs
16
juin
2003
# Re: sourceforge et cvs
Posté par ploum (site web personnel, Mastodon) . Évalué à 1.
Ben je vois pas de quoi raler.. ;)
Mes livres CC By-SA : https://ploum.net/livres.html
[^] # Re: sourceforge et cvs
Posté par M . Évalué à 1.
# Re: sourceforge et cvs
Posté par Mathieu Pillard (site web personnel) . Évalué à 3.
[^] # Re: sourceforge et cvs
Posté par ckyl . Évalué à 1.
[^] # Re: sourceforge et cvs
Posté par Adrien . Évalué à 1.
Mais faut quand même dire que depuis Lost Oasis, y a du mieux (c'est mieux que Free en ce moment par exemple...).
Suivre le flux des commentaires
Note : les commentaires appartiennent à celles et ceux qui les ont postés. Nous n’en sommes pas responsables.